We’re off to a good start with my CLEVER title. Let’s do this list style, to go with the fragmentary theme.
- I thought Carr’s input (who is generally a person I don’t like, so it means something for me to praise him) on the decision making and therefore distracting nature of hyperlinks is very fascinating. It’s totally true that when you encounter a hyperlink you then get pulled out of the text and have to make a decision (even if, albeit, if it’s a minor one) to click on it or not, and then to think about the consequences of missing out on information or getting on a tangent.
- In referencing David Shield’s work it was interesting to think about violating copyright and authorship.. it does feel as if the internet allows for a more blending mindset than a usual book.
- Twitter as a platform of fragmentary writing that encourages sharing of other peoples content! I’d never thought of it that way! Retweeting suddenly means so much more!
- I liked that, overall, this was positive! I’m extremely annoyed with people saying “it’s falling apart! reading writing is falling apart!” (i.e. why I’m not a Carr fan) but this seemed hopeful. It just kind of admitted that there’s a change in how we read and that a change in how we write is the natural next step. It emphasized that this doesn’t need to be the ONLY way people write, but that it’s an interesting alternative and addition.